i think the book version is more interesting... they've shortened it so much on movie! but still it's good to watch too
i find the theory shiznit like that cool =D, i aint read the book...(yet ?) but chyeah, how they try put the gunz and car chases like that ... killed it... i watched a documentry in hk and it was cool =]
Good movie....i like the ending from the book more though... the movie pretty much followed exact format as book.......even script was 95% the same.....only ending was different...
I thought the movie was ok...could have been better... not as gd as the book though...>.<...but still it was interesting..
It was a bit boring at first. After that the story goes on abt that pic, then it became interesting... hey hey...
Absolutely hated it. It's a terrible adaptation of the book. Considering Ron Howard directed The Beautiful Mind, which was another adapted film (BM is biopic though), The Da Vinci Code is utterly horrible. The fact that they casted Tom Hanks to be Robert Langdon (sp?) doesn't help any, which part of "Harrison Ford in Harris Tweed" do the casting directors NOT understand anyways? Along the same line, the fact that they cut one of the two riddles (the Sofia cryptex) is like, hateful. The story look strangely incoherent after thus. And the epithany/revealation Tom Hanks had to solve the 2nd cryptex? It's just confusing to those who haven't read the book. Oh well, I'll still be looking forward to Angels & Demons (in the talk now...) anyways. That would make WAY BETTER visual adaptation.
