US city planning ban on low-slung baggy pants

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by Maverick, Aug 26, 2007.

  1. Maverick

    Maverick Lord Vader

    US city planning ban on low-slung baggy pants



    Baggy trousers that hang way below the belt and expose what the wearer has on underneath could soon be banned in the southern US city of Atlanta, a city council spokesman said Friday.
    "Many youngsters are walking around with their pants way, way below their waists, and you can see everything. Some people call it a fad or a fashion statement but it is simple indecency," Dexter Chambers, the communications director at Atlanta City Council, told AFP by phone.
    "A proposal to change the city code in terms of indecency will go before the public safety legal administrative committee on Tuesday for discussion," he said.
    "From there it would go before the city council, but it's difficult to say when it could be passed. It depends on how much airing it receives, if you pardon the expression," Chambers said.
    Councilman C. T. Martin proposed adding a clause to the city code on public morals "after several of his constituents, including many teachers, asked him to do something about this indecency," Chambers said.
    The ordinance, of which AFP obtained a copy, states that "the dress fad of wearing low hanging/saggy pants which exposes ones underwear is becoming a major concern for communities, cities and states around the country."
    It proposes adding a clause to the code on public morals -- which already bars real or simulated sexual intercourse, indecent exposure, or the touching, caressing or fondling of genitals or women's breasts in public -- to make "the indecent exposure of undergarments" unlawful.
    Press reports have said that the proposed changes would make it illegal for women to run wearing just a sports bra, or to expose their bra straps.
    "The ordinance doesn't mention anything about bras. The American Civil Liberties Union brought that up," Chambers said.
    The trend of wearing oversized trousers that fall down and expose one's smalls derives from the US prison system.
    "It started in prison, where, as I understand it, belts are taken away from inmates. But it evolved into a situation where it was used by prisoners to let others know they were 'available,' and it still has that sexual connotation," Chambers said.
    Very low-slung trousers are already banned in the southern US city of Delcambre, in Louisiana, where offenders' cheek can earn them a fine of 500 dollars (350 euros) or up to six months in jail.
    But Atlanta would not be so harsh, Chambers said.
    "There would only be a small fine, no jail time at all. Councilman Martin would rather send young men and women to college than jail."
     
  2. dim8sum

    dim8sum ♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪....

    god whats so bad about baggy pants anyway

    i dont particularly like it when people dont seem to be able to wear trousers above their arse , but to ban it, is just going too far in my opinion
     
  3. xmichelly

    xmichelly Well-Known Member

    baggy pants are annoying, but banning it seems a little too extreme. it just won't be the same without people wearing baggy pants!
     
  4. brown_bear

    brown_bear ☆‧° ☆﹒﹒‧ ☆ ﹒﹒‧☆‧° ☆

    8,870
    467
    21
    a ban on it....omg....
     
  5. ProjectD

    ProjectD VIP yay :]

    o wow... thats quite stupid, i mean ppl dislike it but banning is going way overboarde=
     
  6. Flames

    Flames Out of Date User

    5,149
    432
    25
    Why ban the baggy pants man...they're cool, is the wearer's fault not the design of it...
     
  7. The_Jelly

    The_Jelly NSFW? :P

    Banning it seems a bit serious, perhaps a small fine.
     
  8. Taxloss

    Taxloss Stripper Vicar

    Just make the local women wear granny panties under their baggy pants and problems are solved lol
     
  9. skid

    skid Well-Known Member

    394
    53
    0
    well i hate it when people where their pants down below their ass and you can see their boxes. Just stupid imo

    oh and from what i understand from reading the article, they are banning the exposure of undergraments and not the actual baggy pants themselves. so yeah if you keep you pants above your ass then it should be fine.
     
  10. skid

    skid Well-Known Member

    394
    53
    0
    Well to be fined for anything in the first place would mean that it has to be banned.
     
  11. asiangang

    asiangang Well-Known Member

    1,313
    86
    0
    hm...kinda sudden dont u think?..
     
  12. MissCheekS

    MissCheekS Reconnaîssant ❤

    yeah.. those extremely baggy pants are there since ages....
    i mean in NL hardly anyone wears it anymore =/ a bit late ha?
     
  13. dim8sum

    dim8sum ♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪....

    well where i live they would have already found a way around this

    most people who wear baggy jeans or sweat pants, usually wear another pair of sweats underneath, so it wouldnt be exposing the undergarments
     
  14. itzd0pey

    itzd0pey Well-Known Member

    581
    68
    0
    lol? they should get better things to do.
     
  15. nyckeion

    nyckeion ....Boo....

    everyone has their own style but then public indecency is a bit of an issue considering if u are in a fancy restaurant and someones boxers are just right in front of ur face.......but then theres a dress code.........its just weird
     
  16. [N]

    [N] RATED [ ]

    500 for breaking a "dress code" law damn the government desperate to find ways to make money off people huh....
     
  17. azndragon

    azndragon Member

    6
    26
    0
    i dont like seeing other guys underwear but giving a fine and/or jail is crazy.
    doesnt the ban go against the 1st amendment?
     
  18. neomooky

    neomooky Active Member

    25
    26
    0
    I blame Marky Mark! and his CK underpant exposing ways!
    It's been down hill since that "Kriss Kross" band and it's backwards wearing clothes..every generation of people has the stupid fashion for their time, but when fashion starts exposing stuff that really should be covered up...you really got to wonder where thing's are going...

    While they are at it they should ban fat people from wearing Bicycle pants! seriously...no one want's to see that....*shudders*....
     
  19. hiake

    hiake Vardøgr of da E.Twin

    I wonder when will Atlanta ban hot pants, bikini and wifebeater (spousal abuser?)... They are quite indecent too.

    And while they are at it, they should ban Hollister and A&F since they are selling sexual images?

    SIGH, retardation indeed sees NO END at this one certain place in the world.