Wii vs PS3 vs XBOX 360

Discussion in 'Gaming Section' started by Kaitou_Kid, Oct 27, 2007.

  1. realazyjai

    realazyjai Well-Known Member

    105
    41
    0
    wouldnt totally agree with that. And what do you mean by when you started 360 - Microsoft ??? I'm taking you mean shit ???

    I personally didnt get a PS3 just as a BR player, it was the upcoming titles which influenced me on getting one. 360 is a very reasonable system at its price, with a GREAT range and variety of games, as of the Wii i got one just for multiplayer purposes.
     
  2. michael38

    michael38 Active Member

    28
    26
    0
    i think xbox360 is more diversed bcuz lots of my friends have it and i would like to get that wireless wheel.
     
  3. Hunterzero

    Hunterzero Member

    6
    26
    0
    So far, the one on top of the next-gen console is the wii then 360 finally the PS3. But the only problem with the Wii is the lack of production and the low supply in stock. What causes people to reject the PS3 is its obscure price and lack of improvement in bringing new gaming experience. In addition the PS3 is too big and very heavy.
     
  4. twfidgit

    twfidgit Member

    16
    26
    0
    i own a X-box 360 but i break alot..but if you have warrant it's really worth it...very awsome console
     
  5. bbes

    bbes Incredible

    well i have to say the ps3 will prob pick up more sales than the 360 now cos its dropped in price and even though its more expensive, it is a blu ray alternative player.
     
  6. dim8sum

    dim8sum ♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪....

    that and MGS4 were the only reasons i got the ps3, the blu ray player was so and so for me, cause i generally dont even buy movies on disks :D

    but yeh gta4 help shift a few more ps3s and with mgs4 coming out that will sell a few more

    but im tempted to buy a 360 when gears of war 2 comes out!
     
  7. khaotic

    khaotic Fobulous

    idk,,,

    To me Gears of War 1 was pretty medicore. Single player was short and nothing but forgettable. Multiplayer was fun for a while, but when you break it down to its core. Not that much there.... I'm expecting tons of content to be added in GOW:2, or else it'll be a complete pass for me.
     
  8. Aznmask

    Aznmask Well-Known Member

    486
    53
    0
    i think ps3 isn't doing successful compare to ps2. BTW ps3 doing worst than Wii or even Xbox 360.
     
  9. [N]

    [N] RATED [ ]

    LOOK AT THIS if you looking for more games/exclusives get XBOX 360, but something more suitable for a complete entertainment system....GET PS3

    Things PS3 have over the XBOX360- Wi-fi connectivity (right out the box, $80 add on for Xbox360), double the xbox HD capability (also replaceable with a normal laptop HD, 100 bucks for 250gb/ compared to Xbox360's $180 120gb HD), Blue-Ray Playback, Bluettooth connectivity, no external power supply, no red rings of death, free-online play, Web TV browser...

    All for 50 bucks more....

    XBOX360 have over ps3- more exclusive games, Infrared (no use for this for me), better online service, 50 dollars less.

    WHAT I choose: all i gotta say is June 12....
     
  10. dim8sum

    dim8sum ♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪....

    lol way to state the obvious -clapclap
     
  11. iris

    iris Well-Known Member

    296
    53
    0
    I think the first Gears of War was only fun if you played the coop mode. The multiplayer was pretty fun for a bit. I don't know if you've seen the video that was just released for GOW2, but it's pretty damn amazing.

    Here is the video if you haven't seen yet
    http://gamevideos.com/video/id/18698
     
  12. khaotic

    khaotic Fobulous

    Co-Op didn't ad much to the lack luster campaign.

    As for GOW 2, I've already seen that video. I still don't know if I'll even rent this game.