Beware...dangerous Olympic Games Logo

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by pirvee, Jun 14, 2007.

  1. pirvee

    pirvee Well-Known Member

    229
    41
    0
    The new 2012 Logo is quite controversial.....and dangerous ....
    Has anyone already seen this promotion clip?



    Mayor wades into 2012 footage row

    The official London 2012 Olympic logo was unveiled on Monday

    Creators of footage promoting the 2012 Olympics should not be paid after it emerged a segment could trigger an epileptic seizure, London's mayor said.

    Ken Livingstone's spoke out after some footage was taken off the organisers' website on the advice of experts.

    Charity Epilepsy Action said it had received 22 calls from people who had suffered fits after watching the clip.

    But the logo's designer has blamed poor promotion for the negative reaction to it, rather than the work itself.

    However, Mr Livingstone said the designer should not be paid a penny for the "catastrophic mistake".

    "Who would go into a firm like that again and ask them to do that work. This is a pretty basic thing," he said.

    The one thing most people know... about epilepsy is that flashing lights and flashing images can cause them problems

    But Michael Wolff, of designers Wolff Olins, who created the logo, said it has not been "done justice" and blamed Olympic organisers for not publicising it properly.

    "I think it's a great shame that it's been shown as a static thing, when it's quite a democratic thing capable of a lot of interpretations," he said.

    The animated film, which was unveiled along with the logo for the London Games on Monday, is now being re-edited by London 2012.

    Organisers said the footage removed concerned showed a "diver diving into a pool which had a multi-colour ripple effect".

    The spokeswoman said: "We are taking it very seriously and are looking into it as a matter of urgency."

    This is among the most popular logos from BBC News website users

    After its release Prof Graham Harding, who developed the test used to measure photo-sensitivity levels in TV material, said it should not be broadcast again.

    Simon Wigglesworth from Epilepsy Action said he was shocked at the choice of animation.

    "The one thing most people know... about epilepsy is that flashing lights and flashing images can cause them problems.

    "The reality is there is only about 5% of people with epilepsy for whom photosensitivity is an issue. That's still 23,000 people."

    The new logo, which cost £400,000 to develop, has also been heavily criticised and more than 38,000 people have signed an online petition to have it scrapped.

    The BBC News website invited users to send in suggestions for alternative logos, and has so far received more than 500.


    Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/6727029.stm
     
  2. Maverick

    Maverick Lord Vader

    Yep, be aware.
    It's the most ugly creation I have ever seen as Olympic logo.
    Just a big waste of money.
     
  3. ugly and more ugly!
     
  4. Taxloss

    Taxloss Stripper Vicar

    Aside of the dangerous aspects of that logo...what the hell is that? Can't see what the figures are and what they're refering to, which means it's a bad logo. Yup, they shouldn't pay that 'designer' a penny.
     
  5. ab289

    ab289 Well-Known Member

    3,435
    414
    271
    looks like a kid did it! headache!
     
  6. dim8sum

    dim8sum ♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪....

    i cant believe £400,00 was wasted on the crappiest logo in the world, the designer should be shot

    They should have just run a competition to create a logo, winner gets their design to be used officially. quality improves and cost nothing
     
  7. pirvee

    pirvee Well-Known Member

    229
    41
    0
    I'm glad the Beijing 2008 logo looks so GREAT!! nothing like the upcoming 2012 thing...
     
  8. chickenutbread

    chickenutbread Well-Known Member

    1,062
    86
    0
    haha. there's already an online petition. that's hilarious. i guess everything's electronic nowadays eh?
     
  9. SugaCutie0

    SugaCutie0 Well-Known Member

    1,165
    86
    0
    What a disappoinment..My 5yr old nephew can make a logo better than that one, any day.-lol
     
  10. Whos more dangerous, pokemon (1st ep) or that stupid logo??
     
  11. The_Jelly

    The_Jelly NSFW? :P

    Ew...? What a waste of money, looks like a 6 yr old designed it.
     
  12. gawain187

    gawain187 Well-Known Member

    I agree. I have seen it on the news and heard many people dislike the design but the promoters still went ahead of it.
     
  13. mingming2006

    mingming2006 Well-Known Member

    1,188
    86
    0
    the promoters are just stupid, for even goin forward with that ugly logo anyway...mayb they should hire me 2 design it for them , since me art is sooo great :D
     
  14. dot

    dot Well-Known Member

    418
    253
    0
    as a puzzle piece, it does look pretty bad... :p
     
  15. Knoctur_nal

    Knoctur_nal |Force 10 from Navarone|

    16,563
    662
    29
    all this rant about ugly...post a pic already..hahah
     
  16. philostrate

    philostrate Well-Known Member

    forgive me but did i see something 'obscene'? i dun understand what the puzzle pieces mean...is it something about union?
     
  17. lammy29

    lammy29 Well-Known Member

    102
    41
    0
    hope they change it
     
  18. kdotc

    kdotc 안녕하세요빅뱅K-Dragon입니다

    is this it??

    [​IMG]
     
  19. Supra

    Supra Well-Known Member

    294
    258
    5
    so ugly that my grandma could've drew better than that and cheaper too
     
  20. nyckeion

    nyckeion ....Boo....

    its like bad graffiti from a 3 year old kid