Chinese History

Discussion in 'Chinese Chat' started by xaznxryux, Jun 25, 2011.

  1. xaznxryux

    xaznxryux Well-Known Member

    2,723
    392
    468
    Hey guys, after watching a few historical series I feel like opening a thread just on discussing Chinese history (pre-Communist era, Qing Dynasty or before)

    I know a few members here are interested in Chinese history so let the discussion begin

    :)

    I remember one member was really interested in the Three Kingdoms era so we just had a long talk
     
  2. xaznxryux

    xaznxryux Well-Known Member

    2,723
    392
    468
    yeh i actually saw this quite awhile ago, the pictures were amazing but all the pictures were around 1890 - pre-modern China
     
  3. [N]

    [N] RATED [ ]

    pretty much they killed each other for superiority because they were mostly short :trollface: kingdoms went down for the envy of height
     
  4. xaznxryux

    xaznxryux Well-Known Member

    2,723
    392
    468
    yeh, but between most wars are 300-400 years of dynasty rule, the worst is Warring States and the 5 Dynasties/10 Kingdoms which lasted about 400-500 years of wars. The Three Kingdom only lasted about 100 years...
     
  5. ralphrepo

    ralphrepo Well-Known Member

    5,274
    459
    249
    I certainly do not mean to belittle your interest in Chinese history, as it is one of my own life long pursuits and a field of deep personal interest. However, I do hope that you understand the impossibility of your request (anything Qing and before) as an equivalent of that in western world history, analogous to anything from before the Great War to 2000 years before the birth of Christ. Your simple "thread" would attempt to cover the breadth and scope of a web site the likes of China History Forum

    I suggest that instead of trying create such a monumental undertaking here, you go there instead as they're much more dedicated and their degree of interest and knowledge is extensive. However, be forewarned; many of their respondents are extremely Pro PRC and highly political; any hint of negative commentary towards China or their government will usually get pounced on by multiple flames. I used to be a member there and had genuinely appreciated their depth of knowledge but eventually grew annoyed of and at the incessantly blind nationalism that pervaded that site and by it's admins. They say that they're fair to all, but (IMHO at least) it seemed that the Chinese animal was lot more equal than any other on that farm. So I eventually resigned my forum membership and withdrew my postings.

    In terms of material though, if one can look beyond the politics, their history research and discussions are top flight and the site should be in your browser bookmarks, insofar as Chinese history goes, as a 'must have' point of reference.

    That being said, there is always a danger of too much politicizing agenda vis a vis history (Chinese or otherwise). The mixing of the two can be horrifically damaging. I cite the suspicions by some research quarters as but one example. In recent years, well preserved bodies of presumed European traders or occidental residents were previously excavated along the ancient silk road but which had been "discovered" headless within their graves. Western archaeologists long suspected that the modern Chinese government purposely did this (ie. secretly removed their blond haired heads) so as to preclude any argument that the area was previously not a part of China. That is, China is purposely attempting to change the evidence of human history to suit its modern political purpose. Nowadays, though they're no longer desecrating dead bodies, even the inclusion of DNA "evidence" can be argued ad infinitum.

    From an article in the New York Times:

    Oh, and if you want to read up on another hot Chinese topic, try looking up Shang human sacrifice and oracle bones.

    Good luck with your research.
     
    #6 ralphrepo, Jul 13, 2011
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2011
  6. xaznxryux

    xaznxryux Well-Known Member

    2,723
    392
    468
    actually I'm part of Chinese History Forum as well...its a great forum for any people interested (basic - expert level)...

    I'm personally using this site to advance my knowledge in the Age of Fragmentation (5 Dynasty/10 Kingdoms)

    Im also aware that pre-Qing is too long to discuss, but its just for interest purposes
     
  7. ralphrepo

    ralphrepo Well-Known Member

    5,274
    459
    249
    Frankly, most of the people here tend to be light on the intellectualism of history and but heavy on the entertainment value. If one gets too deep, I find that people tend to lose interest in the matter rather quickly, LOL...
     
  8. xaznxryux

    xaznxryux Well-Known Member

    2,723
    392
    468
    yeh...btw thanks for the article, i read something similar before...about a 3000 year old Chinese mummy, her hair and skin were still in tact...quite interesting
     
  9. ralphrepo

    ralphrepo Well-Known Member

    5,274
    459
    249
    There was another recent article that I got from China Smack, which lead me to another site with similar pictures about the chance recovery of a three Ming era coffins with one bearing an intact corpse. I don't know how genuine the article is, as the manner in which they, er... recover the remains and artifacts within the sarcophagus flies directly in the fact of what I assume to be proper salvage technique. Link

    These guys look like they work at Home Depot... They took the ring off her finger? (last photo near the bottom) I guess they were in a hurry to clean it up and place it into a museum, LOL...
     
  10. mr_evolution

    mr_evolution ( • )( •ԅ(ˆ⌣ˆԅ)

    9,967
    590
    57
    Ralph, whats in the baby's eyes?
     
  11. ralphrepo

    ralphrepo Well-Known Member

    5,274
    459
    249
    In another article regarding funerary practices of mummified remains found around the Tarim Basin, there was reference to "small flat stones" being placed on an infant corpse's eyes. Link I'm assuming that the practice was similar at the Small River Cemetary 5 site of the Time's 2010 article.

    Another article appeared in a blog with a similar description and a better picture:

    I certainly didn't mean for this to be a thread hijack, but here's more info:

    [video=youtube;AJZ38PtW3SI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJZ38PtW3SI[/video]

    [video=youtube;gphNMFXReVw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gphNMFXReVw&NR=1&feature=fvwp[/video]

    [video=youtube;wRERvnXVmdE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRERvnXVmdE[/video]

    [video=youtube;QatkSOB4XZ8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QatkSOB4XZ8[/video]

    [video=youtube;xE-liHf7dLM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xE-liHf7dLM[/video]
     
    #12 ralphrepo, Jul 13, 2011
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2011
  12. xaznxryux

    xaznxryux Well-Known Member

    2,723
    392
    468