Do you think stone sir protecting people that want to find justice in their own hands to be correct? i.e. the lady that revenged her son's death by killing irresponsible drivers that were not punished in trial?
In a way, as a cop and enforcer of law, he doesn't believe in it, well he was a victim of it. Now he's changed his approach. Do you think it's right? As a cop to make a judgmental call and turn one eye blind to people wanting to seek revenge away from a 'legal' system?
of course not. what kind of question is that -_-;; he is gona get punished by law at the end of the series ^__^
^^ I wouldn't necessarily say that. The corruption and 'need' to meddle w/ evidence is necessary sometimes because the law isn't the ultimatum and does not bring justice.
personally, I find his character is doing the right thing. Mad sir and his crew are idiots if they truly think the justice system is end all be all.
Well.. as a cop.. you're suppose to work by the books. Rules are rules. But however, if he wasn't a cop.. then i guess.. it'll be more.. ok(?) ?
Stone sir too much. he should not meddle. after all, law is law. you may not agree but it has its justice in place and any clues to prosecute, the law will use it. he can be unhappy with it (jail for 15yrs) but he shouldn't do this...he want then he should quit being a cop then can be like batman lor.
yea being in jail for 15years sucks. i feel like he should get more compensation then what he got. he only got the normal cop salary for 15 years...
Doesn't matter who you are, you have to play by the rules and let the judiciary system decide the faith of these criminals. If everyone plays judge then the world will be in anarchy
Stone makes a good points were the bad guys get away with the crimes they committed and the innocent go to jail. Mad is and his gang are pissing me off, telling Stone the rules are rules and you must follow trying to act all righteous. Yes, there are times were he did something stupid, but overall he more of person then a robot that is programed to think. When I hear the BS coming out of Mad and his crew, they make it seem like the person who committed crime should be protected until they get convicted, without much sympathy for the victims. Even when they do get convicted and go to jail, it's just the adult version of time out to think about the bad things they did, while the family still suffers. I feel that the evidence is enough to convict a person and they somehow get away with it, we need cops like Dexter and Stone.
I agree w/ this. The whole purist theory about 'law' is just ridiculous. If that where the case, why do we have amendments and revisions? Obviously law is a game, and it often goes both ways in that the innocent are wrongfully accused and the criminals get away !
wow u guys are dumb, ignorance sure is bliss laws have revision because people actually follow the procedure to revise it? yea going your own way can solve some cases, but it can also create grey areas that detriment innocent people source?? the word often is wrong here imo, it shud be barely. yea criminals do get away in some cases but look how many get caught? if police can do whatever the hell they want, i can't imagine what the world wud be like... -_-
