BBC.co.uk: How older siblings stunt growth

Discussion in 'Health, Beauty, and Fashion' started by hiake, Sep 18, 2007.

  1. zoom_zoom

    zoom_zoom Well-Known Member

    254
    53
    0
    that study has a high probability in europe but not here in the US as I've seen... and plus, parents usually place more attention on the younger one
     
  2. BabyRain

    BabyRain Doppelgänger of da E.Twin

    Yup, naturally. But this research did not specify the gender difference as well. I think it's crap haha.
     
  3. thejephster

    thejephster Member

    10
    26
    0
    my younger brother is taller than me :(
     
  4. hiake

    hiake Vardøgr of da E.Twin

    More attention... That can definitely translate to "Get on a diet, otherwise you'll be obese", flawed-reasoning-based stunted growth... -devil

    If that make any sense, that is -tongue2
     
  5. wind2000

    wind2000 Self Schemata

    How would that apply to a sibling being inferior simply because they are born later? If it should manifest itself that way (older being stronger and younger being inferior), it means that other factors are involved such as long exposure of the parents to toxic materials, the unluckiness of inheriting all those "defective" genes and so on....
     
  6. hiake

    hiake Vardøgr of da E.Twin

    True enough. But point is, isn't it more likely to inherit defective genes if the gene pool (from the parents) contains more defective genes?

    It is not necessary so, I just say it's more likely to be so... And no, even if the parents are extremely careful as to NOT expose to toxic materials (which is extremely difficult if you think about it), there's still the factor of random mutation which MAY lead to an increase of defective genes, no?
     
  7. wind2000

    wind2000 Self Schemata

    Now we are talking probability. Tough luck on the little ones then.
     
  8. litadumas

    litadumas Well-Known Member

    57
    31
    0
    i got 2 older sisters and im da shortest >.< da oldest is 3 inches taller and da 2nd is onli 1/2 inch taller lol
    but i noe a lot of ppl where da youngest is da tallest
     
  9. ~iloveyou~

    ~iloveyou~ New Member

    3
    26
    0
    i would say this is true and also untrue...so 50/50. Consider everything constant, so the life style is the same, same amount of hrs of sleep every day for both kids, same food, same drink, same length of study ...etc...then this may be true.....

    but not everyone is the same...maybe the younger one liks to play a lot of sports..a.nd therefore mor eactive...and therefore taller ....
     
  10. bbes

    bbes Incredible

    this isn't true, its all down to the genes crossing over and random assortment during fertilisation that determines ur height. if ur lucky u will get a tall gene, its not down to siblings and its very hard to prove it is down to that bcos of the variation of the genes.