It's pathetic how they bicker about the shares of the company. What's more idiotic is living in the same roof. Why can't they show some REAL LEGAL aspects.:jb:
I just don't get how she can think she can get 90% of everything, that just don't make sense if I were the judge/jury. I know she have a lot of free cash after that scam but if you look at the whole pic, at most they should get 50/50. It'll be interesting to see how all those legal arguments goes.