Minutes to Fame I or Minutes to Fame II?

Discussion in 'Minutes to Fame II - 殘酷一II' started by yayitzmonica, Apr 11, 2007.

  1. orange123

    orange123 Well-Known Member

    103
    41
    0
    i prefer one because hacken and joey is more compatible with each other..
     
  2. singkwan

    singkwan Member

    16
    26
    0
    Considering that the show should be "cruel", the third season doesn't seem to be "cruel" at all. As a matter of fact, it seems to be more enthusiastic (which is good), but more lenient at the same time. Just look at the times, so many people get into the 50s and 60s and even the 70s. Back in MTF season 1 and 2, people averaged around 40s.

    Not cruel enough!

    However, in terms of the celebrity judges, there's more variety... well, Leo was already a judge... (was Roger? didn't really watch the second season that much). But Harlem. Wow. Didn't expect him to be on the show.
     
  3. LimitedGC03

    LimitedGC03 Active Member

    39
    31
    0
    omg! This show is still going on. I watched the first season, it was hilarious!! I love the judges, because every time they have someone new come in, witch was cool. And some of the contestants were so funny.
     
  4. meemo1031

    meemo1031 Well-Known Member

    83
    234
    0
    i enjoy watching the episodes with hacken more than the ones with sammy, i just dont think he;s funny, a little obnoxious, its so silly now, where sis all the talent go.
     
  5. lobonn

    lobonn Active Member

    27
    226
    0
    I Would Say One Is Alot Better Than Two.
     
  6. Artec210

    Artec210 New Member

    4
    26
    0
    the beginning ep are always the best
     
  7. asiangang

    asiangang Well-Known Member

    1,313
    86
    0
    i like minutes to fame 1 more.....in 2 the hosts are soo noisy..
     
  8. tvbfansi

    tvbfansi Well-Known Member

    119
    41
    1
    One will always better than Two...as it come first.

    Aren't the participants that you are enjoying, instead of the hosts? I found that the participants are pretty talented from Malaysia.
     
  9. poofiemoosie

    poofiemoosie Member

    11
    26
    0
    yeahh, i don't think 3 is very interesting.. they don't "ding" them very often.. isn't that the whole point of the whole show? xD
     
  10. ixbingbingxi

    ixbingbingxi Member

    15
    26
    0
    Minutes to Fame 1 is funnier.
     
  11. i prefer minutes to fame 1. most of the performances in the second one are boring but overall, it's still good!
     
  12. RockkxD

    RockkxD Moderator

    I like both..
     
  13. RockkxD

    RockkxD Moderator

    But, Minutes to Fame I is was more funnier than Minutes to Fame II.
     
  14. gday

    gday Well-Known Member

    130
    41
    0
    Yea I have to agree coz most of the time part 1s are ALWAYS better than sequels. I do prefer hacken and that other dudemore than Miriam and sam. I dunno, Miriam seems a little stiff. I hope this gets better.
     
  15. silverspoon

    silverspoon Member

    6
    26
    0
    i think 1 is better is almost alwayss like that...
     
  16. rogertangcu

    rogertangcu Member

    7
    26
    0
    good show
     
  17. anthonylimjs

    anthonylimjs New Member

    1
    26
    0
    i really like the last girl that peformed and the song she sang
     
  18. lianglien

    lianglien Member

    16
    26
    0
    minutes to fame is a very good and funny show...with the two funny host...very entertainment show...love part one and two but kinda hate part three due to the reason of the two host change
     
  19. Babulu

    Babulu Member

    23
    1
    0
    why the title is so different between English and Chinese? it's called Minutes to Fame while in Chinese is Chan Ku (cruel). haven't watched both series but the title got me in.